Automated Leak Test Stations

Pressure-decay, mass-flow, and helium leak testing — fixtured, sequenced, and data-logged for production.

Test methods Pressure decay, mass flow, helium, H₂ tracer
Sensitivity 0.1 sccm down to 1×10⁻⁵ sccm and below
Cycle time ≈5–60 s by method and volume
Test pressure 0.3–10 bar typical
Configurations Standalone, in-line, rotary, multi-lane, robotic
Instruments CTS, ATEQ, InterTech, Uson, Inficon
Data Serialized; OPC UA / MQTT / SQL to MES
Standards IATF 16949 MSA, PPAP, Gauge R&R

If you are evaluating automated leak test stations for your line, you are usually trying to solve one of three problems: leaks escaping to the customer and driving PPM, an operator-loaded bench test that cannot keep up with takt, or the need for serialized data on every part instead of clipboards and sample plans. We build the station around whichever is biting you hardest.

AMD Machines has designed custom test and inspection systems for more than thirty years, with over 2,500 machines delivered. An automated leak test station from AMD is engineered around your part — its geometry, sealing surfaces, internal volume, test pressure, target leak rate, and cycle time — and integrated with the controls and traceability your customers and auditors expect.

What is an automated leak test station?

An automated leak test station is a production machine that leak-tests every part without an operator manually loading, sealing, and reading an instrument. It presents the part to a sealing fixture, clamps it under repeatable force, pressurizes or evacuates it through a calibrated path, executes a stabilization-and-measurement sequence, and routes the result — pass, reject, or fault — to a sorter, conveyor, or robot.

Compared to a bench tester, an automated station:

  • Seals the part identically every cycle, eliminating operator-induced variation
  • Runs at a fixed, deterministic cycle time, so testing never becomes the bottleneck
  • Captures serialized data — every part, every reading, timestamped — for SPC and traceability
  • Enforces 100% inspection rather than sampling, which is what modern PPM targets require

How an automated leak test station works

  1. Part identification — barcode, DataMatrix, or RFID read at infeed; no scan, no test.
  2. Load and seal — the part lands in a rigid nest; pneumatic or servo clamps drive sealing tooling under controlled force.
  3. Fill — air or tracer gas flows in through a calibrated path to the target test pressure (typically 0.3–10 bar).
  4. Stabilization — a controlled hold lets adiabatic heating dissipate; the single most important phase for repeatability.
  5. Measurement — the instrument records pressure decay, flow rate, or tracer-gas concentration against reject thresholds.
  6. Vent and unload — controlled exhaust, the fixture opens, and the part routes to pass, reject, or rework.

Done well, that sequence repeats every few seconds with Gauge R&R under 10% of the reject threshold. The difference between that and a tester that "passes everything in the morning and rejects everything by afternoon" is fixture design, stabilization sizing, thermal compensation, and instrument selection — exactly the engineering AMD does in-house.

Leak test methods compared

Method Best for Typical sensitivity Typical instruments
Pressure decay Rigid castings, valve bodies, small–mid cavities 0.1–1 sccm CTS Sentinel, ATEQ F5/F520, Uson, InterTech
Mass flow Large volumes (>~300 cc), flexible plastic parts to ~0.01 sccm CTS, ATEQ mass-flow series
Helium tracer (vacuum chamber or sniffer) Hermetic enclosures, refrigerant and fuel components 1×10⁻⁵ sccm and below Inficon, Pfeiffer Vacuum, Agilent
Forming gas (5% H₂ / 95% N₂) High-volume tracer testing at lower gas cost ~1×10⁻⁶ sccm INFICON Sensistor

Many production stations combine two methods — a fast pressure-decay gate on every part with scheduled helium audits, or mass flow for the main cavity and pressure decay on a secondary circuit. We size the method to your reject threshold with measurement-system margin, not the other way around.

Key components of an AMD leak test station

  • Leak-test instrument — CTS, ATEQ, InterTech, Uson, or Inficon mass spectrometer, sized to sensitivity, volume, and pressure
  • Sealing fixture and nest — rigid tooling, hardened locating surfaces, low-compliance sealing geometry, calibrated clamp force
  • Gas-handling skid — instrument-grade regulators, filter-dryers, and valve manifolds (SMC, Festo, Parker) plumbed for minimum dead volume
  • Controls and HMI — Allen-Bradley CompactLogix/ControlLogix or Siemens S7-1500, with FactoryTalk View or WinCC
  • Safety system — dual-channel circuits per ISO 13849, interlocked guarding, and pressure-relief design for tests above 7 bar
  • Sortation and data — pass/reject diverters, reject-bin lockout, and serialized logging to your MES
  • Optional vision and markingmachine vision inspection for pre-test verification and part marking and traceability for post-test serialization

Configurations we build

  • Standalone benchtop or pedestal stations — operator-loaded gates for low-volume, high-mix work
  • In-line single-station testers — integrated with powered conveyors via lift-and-locate or walking-beam indexing
  • Rotary-index stations — 4–8 positions splitting load, fill, stabilize, test, and vent so takt beats test time
  • Multi-lane parallel testers — multiple fixtures sharing one instrument (or one each) when test time exceeds takt
  • Robot-tended cells — a robotic cell loads, tests, and sorts, often combined with assembly or dispensing
  • Combination test cells — leak plus functional test, vision, or marking on one platform; see our end-of-line test systems

Integration, controls, and traceability

"The green light was on" no longer satisfies customers or auditors. Every AMD automated leak test station ships with:

  • Per-part serialized records — part ID, test pressure, stabilization time, reading, result, operator, timestamp
  • Real-time SPC — X-bar/R, Cpk, and rule-based trend alarms on the HMI, configurable per part number
  • MES integration — OPC UA, MQTT, ODBC/SQL, or REST push to Rockwell FactoryTalk, AVEVA, Ignition, SAP, or a custom historian
  • Recipe management — part-number-driven setup loads clamp force, pressure, stabilization, and thresholds on barcode scan
  • Audit-grade reporting — controlled access and exportable test reports for quality engineering reviews

Industries we serve

  • Automotive — valve bodies, manifolds, fuel and brake components, EV battery enclosures and cold plates
  • Heavy equipment — hydraulic blocks, fuel rails, cooling systems, gearbox housings
  • Aerospace and defense — fluid lines, actuators, and sensor housings held to FAI and PPAP requirements
  • Electronics — sealed connectors, IP-rated enclosures, battery packs
  • Appliances and consumer products — refrigeration circuits, pumps, water-handling components

Throughput, cycle time, and ROI

The cost of one leak escape at a Tier 1 customer — containment, sorting, chargebacks — routinely exceeds the cost of the station that would have caught it.

When we scope a station we walk through four things: required sensitivity versus cycle time (which decides single-station versus rotary or multi-lane architecture), your PPM target and escape cost (which set the measurement-capability floor — we target Gauge R&R under 10% of the reject threshold), the labor an automated station displaces across shifts, and the scrap you recover by catching drift in real time with SPC. We will not put a fabricated payback number on this page — bring your volumes and quality costs and we will ground the business case together.

Why AMD Machines

We are not an instrument reseller bolting a CTS or ATEQ unit to a frame. We engineer the entire station in-house — mechanical, electrical, controls, fluid power, vision, and data — against the part on your bench and the takt on your floor:

  • 30+ years of custom automation and 2,500+ machines delivered
  • Fixture, thermal, and stabilization engineering that designs out false rejects before runoff
  • Gauge R&R proven against known-good and known-bad master parts before shipment
  • One supplier for the assembly automation, machine vision, and marking systems the tester integrates with

Have a part, a target leak rate, and a takt time? That's enough to start. Request a quote or send us your part print and we'll scope the station around it.

Frequently asked questions

What is an automated leak test station?

An automated leak test station is a custom-engineered machine that seals a part, applies a controlled test pressure or vacuum, and uses an instrument to detect any escape of air or tracer gas. It runs at production cycle time, sorts pass and reject parts automatically, and logs serialized results so every unit shipped has a verified leak-test record.

What is the difference between pressure decay, mass flow, and helium leak testing?

Pressure decay seals the part, pressurizes it, and measures how much the pressure drops over a fixed test time — best for moderate sensitivity and small to mid-size cavities. Mass flow measures the actual rate of air bleeding into the part at steady state and shrugs off thermal and compliance noise, which makes it stronger on large or flexible parts. Helium tracer-gas testing is the most sensitive — a mass spectrometer detects helium escaping through micro-leaks down to about one part in ten million, used when pressure-based methods cannot reach the required leak rate.

What leak rate can an automated leak test station detect?

Pressure decay reliably detects leaks in the 0.1 to 1 sccm range on typical industrial parts. Mass flow extends sensitivity to roughly 0.01 sccm. Helium vacuum testing reaches 1×10⁻⁵ sccm and below. The achievable sensitivity always depends on part volume, test pressure, stabilization time, fixture compliance, and ambient temperature stability — we size the system to your specified reject threshold with measurement-system margin.

How fast can an automated leak test station run?

Cycle times range from roughly 5 seconds for simple pressure-decay tests on small rigid parts up to 30 to 60 seconds for high-sensitivity helium tests on large volumes. When the inherent test time exceeds line takt, we design multi-station rotary or parallel-fixture configurations so the throughput of the station matches the line.

How do you avoid false rejects on a leak tester?

Most false rejects come from thermal noise, fixture compliance, or insufficient stabilization. We instrument the part temperature, compensate the reject threshold dynamically, design rigid low-compliance nests, validate stabilization time empirically during runoff, and run Gauge R&R studies against known-good and known-bad reference parts before turning the station over to production.

Can the leak test station integrate with our MES and SPC system?

Yes. Every AMD test station serializes each test, timestamps the result, and pushes data over OPC UA, MQTT, or direct SQL to your MES, historian, or quality database. We support real-time X-bar and R charting, Cpk calculation, and trend alarming on the HMI, and we routinely integrate with platforms such as Rockwell FactoryTalk, AVEVA Wonderware, Ignition, and SAP.

Can you retrofit a leak test station into our existing production line?

Yes. We regularly insert leak test stations into existing conveyors, robotic cells, and assembly lines. We survey the available floor space, conveyor height, takt time, and upstream and downstream handoffs, then engineer the fixture, frame, and controls for minimum disruption — many retrofits are installed during a planned shutdown weekend.

What standards and quality requirements do your leak test stations support?

We design to IATF 16949 measurement-system requirements for automotive programs, including MSA, Gauge R&R, and AIAG SPC. For industrial and aerospace work we follow customer PPAP and FAI requirements, and we provide IQ/OQ/PQ-style validation documentation when the customer's quality system requires it.

Let's Engineer Your Solution

Tell us about your part, cycle time, and quality targets. We've built 2,500+ machines over 30 years — chances are we've solved something similar.

Request a Quote